Information + Human = Time

I can’t articulate 99% of what I want to talk about. That will probably make this blog post longer, rather than shorter, knowing me.

Imagine a plant, like a bulb flower or a vegetable bush. It ‘fruits’ based on an inherent time-setting defined by “the nature of it”. Every plant has its own, varying time setting. The details of the specific lineage of that category of that plant makes it vary, and of course, even in a group of identical plants, there is some variance.

These settings are like “defaults”. But they aren’t hard laws. You can actually affect the fruiting cycle of plants, make it a bit slower or faster, depending on the conditions it lives in. (According to some, it can depend even on psi rapport, but we’ll leave that one for another day.)

I’ve talked with a couple people who said they psychically tuned into trees. Both of them said the most astounding thing was how “slow” the tree was thinking. As if it were just… on a different time-scale than we are. As if perhaps reality moved more slowly for them. I imagine that butterflies, with their short life spans, might perceive things much “faster” than we do somehow. Maybe they live an entire lifetime-worth in their 3-14 day (depending on breed) lives. In other words, maybe the lifespan and ‘timing’ is not merely about how long they biologically live, but also relates to the speed at which they perceive reality — or, “information”.

Think about humans. We reach ‘maturity’ based on an inherent time-setting defined by “the nature of what we are”. (i.e., humans, not snakes or whales.) There are smaller cycles within our overall life span for various unfoldings. We vary not only based on our species, but potentially based on our unique breed (genetics), and just like plants, also based on the conditions that we have lived within.

Everything has its own time for maturing, fruiting, expressing, dying.

To everything (turn, turn, turn)
There is a season (turn, turn, turn)
as the song goes.

We have our own speed for “perceiving reality” (information), as well. This is a general range for our species, but varies within that range by person.

Mass, according to physics, is really just vibrating energy. The speed of the vibration determines the ‘density’ that it will appear ‘compared to our own’. When things vibrate more quickly than us, they may appear to be less solid, like water, then like gas, then like the spectrum of heat-sound-light. If it vibrates beyond the range of our biological perception tools, it passes into the infrared, and X-ray, zones. When things vibrate more slowly than us, they may appear to be more solid, like a tree, then hard as stone, then hard as metal, even hard as diamond. Of course, this is only measured by our own vibration rate: how we “relate to” other things. If our ‘attention’ is at the vibrational rate for gaseous materials, maybe to us, that is real and solid and ‘reality’.

So it is possible (reaching, here) that an incredibly slow-vibrating life form might live so slowly we cannot perceive them as alive. We may perceive them as giant boulders or something. It could take a million years for that lifeform to change from one state to another, into something we can’t imagine or understand, but our species is only exposed to things for about a century, or even with history, only a few centuries that we can hold together in good cultural cohesion (understanding).

It is possible there are lifeforms that live so quickly we cannot measure them. Or that in a physics sense, vibrate too quickly to even be in the visual scale for us. Maybe we could only hear them, for the entire 12.5 seconds of what to them is a long life.

Now, time doesn’t exist. Nor does space. I believe this, although if I believed it even more I’d be a better viewer.

How can vibration, which is a linear time-based thing, exist?

But “perception” does. Consciousness. How, who knows, but it must, since we’re thinking about it.

I’ve heard that we can have a dream that seems like it lasts for days, in the space of a few seconds. That implies that perception is not bound by time.

I believe that information is energy; that like space/time, they are essentially the same thing from a different perspective.

Our biological bodies, like the plant and the butterfly, are energy-constructs that by their nature vibrate within a certain rate. Possibly as part of that, we also perceive information within a certain rate. This is not about what energy-information is ‘inherent inside us’. ALL of it is inherent inside us. It is about how long it takes us to fork it out of ourselves, to “unfurl it” within ourselves.

To bring it from the seed of potential, to the fruition of our understanding.

Its own cycle of life.

What if information has its own time-setting? Or what if our own “relationship” to various energy/ information has certain defaults in that respect?

The other day, I suddenly perceived information as if it were a thing. As if it were a ball of layered energy like an onion, that would simply “blossom” (from seemingly nothing) inside us like a spontaneously growing energy-flower. Except, not a ball, of course… just everywhere and nowhere, since there is no space. 😉

I had the sense that of the conglomerate of information that makes up any remote viewing target, that different elements of that information have their own time. By that I mean that whether it is the information-energy of ‘that thing’ or of ‘us’ or of ‘the relationship’ (on some level, those may not even be different things, but I won’t go there!), perhaps the “seed to maturity” cycle is different for different collections of information, just like it is different for everything else we know about.

As if information exists at different human-perceptual rates depending on… something; its nature.

I’m explaining it all terribly, of course.

The really trippy part was this: I really ‘sensed’ in that moment that when I am exposed to “a target” in remote viewing, there is information I get ‘right then’ (I think of it that way), but there is information that is not going to “reach maturity inside me” — be understood properly — like waves of it, or blooms of it, at various other speeds. 8 hours, a couple weeks, a few months, whatever.

Thinking of information as a ‘thing’ was hard enough, but thinking of information having to “incubate inside me until it reaches a maturity where I will perceive it clearly” was kind of a trip too.

Since I don’t believe in time and space, I’m not sure how any of this makes sense. I find it all completely confusing.

But fascinating. Because I felt it inside me like I do spontaneous dowsing, like literally I could sense my body and its relationship with information and how information just ‘had its own time in me’–although that is more likely my perceptual time than the info’s… but who knows?

This makes me wonder if perhaps doing a session, walking away, and doing another a week later, two months later, prior to feedback mind you, might result in some interesting other-data that we wouldn’t see were they just separate sessions each with feedback. Could there be some kind of “information incubation period”?

More importantly, I think that humans can force this to change by Will. I think if we recognize this, that we can specifically “intend” within ourselves to speed up that fruition process, to make all the information available to us “right now.” Perhaps some people are instinctively and unconsciously better at this than others.


One comment

  1. Hi PJ,Will you finish your “Changing Role of a Student” series someday? I hope you keep updating your blog. It’s very helpful to people like me who have experiences that don’t fit into neat little categories.I’ve seen information as object, too, although I saw it as a crystalline structure rapidly building onto itself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *