Select Page

It’s taken a lot longer than I expected to be healthy. I thought I was ‘fine’ sooner, but then discovered I wasn’t really. My health improvements seem to “cycle” on a slow spiral upward. Finally, though, my brain seems to have fully recovered. As much as it’s going to I guess. It seems to function ok, if I build in caveats like “I’m a lot older now than last time it worked fully so of course it’s different” and “most people don’t have the kind of focus and memory I did when young so I’m more normal now which is still ok.” I realized, now that I am getting enough sleep and nothing hurts all the time and my brain is getting enough oxygen:

I could view again.

*

To start, Law and I decided to do tandem work daily again, which we used to do a million years ago. So we both do a view that day, the target is whatever we assign to this session, and then that night we snap a photo of our view page(s), send to each other, then meet up on the phone, and either generate (if randomly) or go get (if pre-generated) the target feedback. We spend time with our own session, looking at feedback and considering the data, and then when done, we look at the other person’s work, then we talk about it. This is a precog tasking model. I prefer to do all viewing that way where possible. The last time Law and I were doing tandem I was using an Archetype RV experimental model. That was eons ago. Any viewing after that has been sporadic, brief and on my own.

I have a viewing format I set up to try long ago, and never was able to get to (due to health issues), so I’m starting with that. It’s a brief round with Mark, chakras and Aeons, then a ‘weaving’ with the target, an intro and the elements run, then a meditation on problem relationships that would affect data in the session. So all of that is from the archetype model. Then an initial scan of a variety of things relevant to the task and protocol, and then three ideograms [which for me are very complex/compound] and the sense I get from them. That’s all just “prep” before the actual view.

I have an experimental form that combines my “Aspect RV” format with using my Aeons and ‘power tools’ given me internally, that I also made long ago and had never got to try out. The Aspect approach is a very wide base of options. This limits it though, to my Aeons and tools. I do two queries for each of the 12 Aeons, then 3 queries for the group. Then I work with the tools to see what they might be able to add to the process or explore in more detail. But there’s only so much time so what I actually get to is another story. I’ve only been doing it two days and I barely finished the Aeons and didn’t get to any tools either day.

The primary goal is the daily time-spent with my aeons and tool-friends, a meditation you might say, and better integration as a result, and learning more about the tools and how I can use them. I need to do that anyway so this is a good means of it. The second goal is improvement in my viewing, or somehow in myself that contributes to viewing. That may be a medium or even long term element. The third goal is doing decently on the practice task in question. So that’s at the bottom of the list, though of course it matters for many reasons, not the least of which it’s frackin depressing to do badly especially when the approach I’m using requires a boatload of time investment.

I tend to learn much more about myself and viewing in retrospect, than during the moment, so even most bad views are educationally useful if intuitively reviewed later. It’s a larger life-thing, not just the hobby of the view, that is affected by the effort.

*

I will be blogging anything I want to be sure I remember later, related firstly to tools and aeons, and after that potentially to viewing.

*

Oh, and here’s an update: I had an interesting view experience and then mostly, after-view archetype-like ‘sharing’ experience, with the moon Ganymede many years ago. At the time, I went to an official site for additional (yes, blowing protocol) feedback, it was officially a ball of ice. Descriptions, pictures, all said so. The original post after viewing was on the old firedocs blog from May 2007. I archived the writeup the next year on my Red Cairo blog in the post Ganymede. The biggest deal was that both the view and my “shared experience” with (him?) made a tidal-pull ocean very central. Which allegedly based on feedback at the time, was totally wrong. It was pretty earth-like in that regard.

But just the other day I came across an article saying that scientists now think there might be actual water oceans after all, underground at least, and it might have more going on in various earth-like ways than we realized, with everything from volcanic activity to a stronger magnetosphere and so on. Oh here’s the article. It’s from a year or two ago but I hadn’t seen it until now. No they did not say tidal oceans on the surface, or even accessible from the surface, but I suspect someday they will. Because that was sky above me not rock. I think this year we are supposed to get more probe data from there. Of course I might just be wrong, very possible. Still I maintain an interest in it, now.

I like Ganymede. Personally as an entity. The planets — and that is a planet, according to him and even Sun, no matter how we prefer to categorize things based solely on orbit, which in our model makes him a moon — they are all gods-little-g. Earth/Gaia too. It’s kind of mind boggling how… dense-big-complex they are compared to us, but I guess when you think about it that shouldn’t be surprising.

P